The business decision
The plan begins with the outcome the business needs and the pages that support it. A broad wish for more traffic needs a more precise decision before it can guide an implementation backlog.

A sequence your team has the capacity to deliver
If you already have an audit or a set of goals but cannot assign the next release, SEO planning turns those inputs into a feasible sequence. I help the team decide what should happen first, which dependencies must be resolved and how each change will be checked. The output is a plan the responsible people can challenge and use.

30-minute consultation · $200 USD · paid after the call, only if you don't continue with ongoing work
The plan begins with the outcome the business needs and the pages that support it. A broad wish for more traffic needs a more precise decision before it can guide an implementation backlog.
Audits, search data, release notes and prior recommendations are reviewed for their relevance and limits. A finding without enough support becomes an investigation task, not a confirmed reason to change the site.
We identify who can modify templates, content, infrastructure and measurement. Existing release commitments and approval requirements affect the sequence. A plan that assumes unavailable people is not ready to assign.
Platform changes, commercial deadlines and other projects can alter what is sensible to do now. The plan records those conditions so the reason for a priority remains visible when circumstances change.
An SEO audit investigates what is happening. Planning organizes the work that known findings and goals can support. If the evidence does not establish the problem, the sequence includes the research needed before implementation. It does not turn an uncertain diagnosis into a larger project.
A consulting engagement can examine a particular choice. Content strategy makes decisions about the editorial inventory. This service connects those inputs with technical and operational responsibilities in one delivery sequence. The distinction prevents several suppliers from assigning overlapping roadmaps to the same team.
Record the current pages, available measurements, known issues and releases already planned. Preserve the assumptions that would change the recommendation if they prove wrong.
Assess relevance to the business goal, confidence in the evidence, affected scope, effort and dependencies. A small verified defect may deserve attention before an attractive but untested opportunity.
Identify who approves the recommendation and who can implement it. Resolve missing information or access before a task is presented as ready to start.
Specify what should be observable after implementation and where it will be checked. A completed ticket is kept separate from confirmation that the live page changed.
Set the conditions for revisiting priorities and comparing outcomes. Timing follows the release and the available data, rather than a universal promise of results by a fixed date.
Priorities are reasoned decisions, not a score copied from a tool. The team needs to understand why a task is in this order.
| Type of work | Planning treatment |
|---|---|
| A reproducible defect | Identify affected pages, owner and acceptance check, then assess its urgency in the business context. |
| A possible opportunity | Keep the supporting evidence and assumptions visible. Define a test or further research when confidence is limited. |
| A blocked dependency | Record what must happen first and who can resolve it. Do not count a blocked task as available delivery capacity. |
| A change already being delivered | Coordinate requirements and validation with that release instead of commissioning a competing change. |
The deliverable can include a prioritized work register, dependency view, implementation briefs and measurement definitions. The format should fit the tools your team already uses. Page or template, evidence, action, owner and acceptance criteria stay connected, so a person can take responsibility without reconstructing the entire analysis.
The agreement defines the planning horizon and review responsibilities. It does not silently include recurring writing, development or reporting. When the team needs capacity to keep the plan moving, the Growth Accelerator Team is a separate operating model through Growing Search.
Francisco's published integrated-team approach distinguishes recommendation, approval, implementation and validation. My role in planning is to preserve the SEO reasoning while comparing the work with the platform and the people available. Growing Search's specialist delivery can be scoped separately, and your internal team retains its business approvals.
An audit can propose more work than the next release can absorb. The current operating model and technical advisory method show how priorities, owners and validation are documented. You can inspect that approach before discussing the planning scope.
Google recommends checking a provider's reasoning against its official guidance. An expected effect remains a hypothesis until implementation and observation provide more evidence.
Yes. The findings are reviewed with their sources, assumptions and current relevance. The plan can use reliable work already completed. Where a recommendation lacks evidence, it becomes a question to investigate rather than an automatic implementation task.
No. The team can agree on delivery responsibilities and review points, but search engines, demand and competitors are outside its control. The plan distinguishes an implementation deadline from an expected performance change.
Methods are selected for the documented problem. The plan explains which approach fits, why it is prioritized and how the team will check it. A catalogue of tactics without those decisions would not give the team an executable plan.
Examine a decision before committing to the plan.
Build evidence for query and page priorities.
Add recurring execution capacity under an agreed scope.
Share the goals, existing findings, release commitments and people available to implement. The first conversation can separate missing research from a planning or delivery problem.
30-minute consultation · $200 USD · paid after the call, only if you don't continue with ongoing work
SEO Francisco · AI assistant